It looks like the state of Minnesota might have to do battle with the Department of Homeland Security. And that battle actually had its start in a 2005 law that was designed to improve airport security for commercial flights. When it fully takes effect, the federal government's Real ID requires an improved driver's license that will help stop identity fraud and enhance security.
However, Minnesota is not able to comply with Real ID because in 2009 the state passed a law that banned it from implementing or even preparing to comply with the new federal law! According to Minnesota, it would first have to repeal the 2009 law but even in doing that, necessary changes to come in line with Real ID wouldn't be ready until early 2018.
However, this is the trivia question of the day. Since when does "state law" supersede "federal law?" It's common knowledge that federal law trumps state law...always. States, however, can make laws tougher than federal ones but not weaken or block them. States that have legalized marijuana are still in conflict with federal law that prohibits the drug. If the feds get you, you're cooked!
So, Minnesota has dug its own grave, placed a beautiful headstone and is burying itself, for you see, if the state does not come around to Real ID requirements when there are needed (technically sometime in 2016!), TSA personnel will prevent passengers from boarding planes. However, a passport will be acceptable.
And oh. It's strange that DHS hasn't mentioned the invalid nature of the 2009 law, especially since Minnesota has asked for and been denied extensions. Simple: If you didn't have the law, there wouldn't be any problem.
But talk about shooting yourself in the foot. Minnesota could give lessons.
No comments:
Post a Comment